isnt it good to see Oasis get the credit they deserve for making the 2 best albums of all time?

Oasis albums
tongue in cheek asked:

http://ukpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5iW6fLC8TvC7oQJciy_gjEF8GjnTQ
.
lol im sorry but how the hell do you expect me to take you seriously when you say the stone roses are crap???

im glad i dont listen to music with your ears!
.



Comments (8)    Posted in Rock and Pop    

Subscribe RSS 2.0 feed. Leave a response, or Trackback from your own site.




8 Responses to 'isnt it good to see Oasis get the credit they deserve for making the 2 best albums of all time?'

  1. the crushinator - April 20th, 2010 at 7:28 pm

    wtf?!
    I like Oasis but I soooo don’t agree with this!
    I’d take Radiohead over Oasis and friggin day, not only that but the Stone Roses are freaking terrible why are they even mentioned? and honestly I know the Beatles are constantly argued whether or not they are the best band ever but put them up against the other three and they still blow them out of the water no matter what.

  2. mikeydred - April 22nd, 2010 at 8:14 am

    Oasis are good , but not that good. I and a million others could list ten better albums , but when it all comes down to it it’s a matter of personal taste an memory.

    Supposedly the music when your 14-18 is the most important to you , but I was just listening to Road To Rouen by Supergrass which I would put above everything Oasis have done since their second album.

    Physical Graffiti , Blood on the Tracks are two more.

    The world would be a poorer place without Oasis , but , in MY opinion they’re not the best

  3. Albert R - April 25th, 2010 at 7:38 am

    They made the 2 best albums of all time? God, I missed that. I just heard a load of stuff that crossed the Beatles with Status Quo. Better than listening to Robbie Williams, to be sure, but hardly the stuff of genius.

    (…and the Stone Roses, whilst not completely crap, were stunningly mediocre).

  4. BC - April 26th, 2010 at 9:42 pm

    I’d like to know how Oasis ended up higher than half of those bands (Pink Floyd, Blur, Muse, etc…) Oasis was never that great of a band (not to mention terribly over rated) and really shouldn’t be number one on any “best of” list.

  5. pablo escabar 1 - April 28th, 2010 at 5:48 pm

    Oasis should make an album called-all our songs sound the same!,they are only there cos of popularity(and i think that
    most people have shite taste in music,so popularity is not
    always quality).Plus the stoneroses are way better!.

  6. Karl D - April 30th, 2010 at 3:24 pm

    Are you deaf? Oasis ar4e just Beatles wannabes

  7. Natty-Lea - May 3rd, 2010 at 5:47 am

    I think Oasis are good, but Radiohead should be at the top. :-/

  8. oasisrock_org - May 5th, 2010 at 4:41 pm

    Radiohead are for depressed students.

    oasis are rock pigs who dont give a F&*^ & they sell 60 million albums! :)


Leave a Reply